May 2009
Fox tail is a sign of support for political party
thisisnorthdevon.co.uk
May 14, 2009
Click here for link
A FOX TAIL has been attached to a roadside Conservative Party billboard.
The bushy attachment was spotted this week on a road between Wembworthy and Eggesford, near Chulmleigh.
A woman at Eggesford Hunt Kennels said the tail was attached to the sign as a way of showing opposition to the hunting ban.
She added: "The Conservatives are our best chance of getting hunting back to how it used to be. The fox tail was attached to the billboard as a sign of support."
League Against Cruel Sports campaigner Alan Briggs, from Bideford, said: "I think it's disgraceful, in very bad taste. I've not heard of anything like this happening before."
A South Molton motorist who drove past the sign on Monday said: "I am not particularly anti-hunt, but I found this a most distasteful experience. What is the person who put this up trying to say?
"I thought it to be barbaric, and I live locally. What would visitors to our beautiful area think of such a horrific display?"
The poster went up weeks before people go to the polls for the Devon County Council and European elections.
Hunting with dogs was banned in 2005, but it is still lawful to follow a scent and flush out a fox.
David Cameron has promised MPs a free vote on the hunting ban if the Tories win the next general election.
The League Against Cruel Sports, meanwhile, claims that most people support the ban.
Death knell for hunting ban as police abandon monitoring operations
The Times
May 15, 2009
Click here for link
Police forces are to stop monitoring hunts in a change of policy that sounds the death knell for the hunting ban, The Times has learnt.
New guidance from the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) states that gathering evidence of illegal hunting is difficult, that the ban is hard to enforce and that chief constables have more pressing priorities.
In future, forces should rely on anti-hunt activists to produce information, it says. But they should also be “very cautious” of such groups and recognise that hunting is an “emotionally charged” subject.
Hunts will also no longer be required to inform police in advance of the time and place of meets and their planned route.
Richard Brunstrom, Chief Constable of North Wales and the Acpo spokesman on rural affairs, said: “Hunting is definitely not a policing priority. It is not illegal to wear a red coat and ride a horse in a public place.”
The new guidance undermines one of the most controversial pieces of legislation introduced by the Labour Government, which took up 700 hours of parliamentary time.
Since the Hunting Act came into force in 2004, there have been eight prosecutions, of which only three have been successful, with one pending. Hunting has thrived.
Mr Brunstrom said that police had to chose which areas of law enforcement to devote scarce resources to. He said: “If you look at hunting, the penalties do not include a prison sentence for offenders. This puts the Hunting Act to the lower rather than the higher end of offences. Parliament had the chance to include imprisonment as a sentence but did not do so.”
The new guidance is not binding but was unanimously approved by the country’s most senior officers this week. Officers are urged to avoid “acrimonious, time consuming, frustrating and ultimately fruitless activity”.
Senior officers expressed concern that their neutrality had been compromised by being forced to release details of meets through freedom of information requests to activists who had gone on to disrupt hunts.
David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has made it clear that he favours a repeal of the Hunting Act and in the event of a general election victory will offer MPs a free vote in government time, although a backbencher would have to produce a Bill.
Mr Brunstrom said: “I am pleased with the new guidance but hunting is definitely not a policing priority and don’t let me give you the impression it is. But that does not mean we are not going to deal with it. We recognise it is the law of the land and the duty of the police to enforce it — but to do so proportionately and according to priorities.”
Mr Brunstrom said that forces needed a consistent approach in dealing with reports of unlawful hunting.He also raised concerns about militants becoming involved with anti-hunt organisations and said that police had to be cautious when people made complaints to them. He outlined the difficulties facing police. “If there are offences they are likely to be taking place in a remote rural environment. We are not very well equipped to follow hunts and get evidence and nor do we think we can justify it. Pursuing hunts is an expensive and sophisticated operation.”
He accepted the need to train more police in hunt investigations and said he hoped that the pro-hunt Countryside Alliance and the RSPCA, the International Fund for Animal Welfare and the League Against Cruel Sports would attend training seminars to give their views. A hunt investigation manual is to be distributed to forces before the autumn season.
The Countryside Alliance said: “We have always understood what a difficult job the police have in dealing with such a confusing piece of legislation. But the guidance suggests that the sort of engagement some police forces have had with animal rights groups should, quite rightly, be avoided.”
A spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sport said: “We fought for 80 years for the hunting ban and, while we accept it is not a high priority for police, a ban was the will of Parliament and is the will of the people and we are going to press for more prosecution cases to be brought.”
Countryside Alliance calls for children to be taught about blood sports
The Telegraph
16 May 2009
Click here for link
Hunting, shooting and fishing should be included in the national curriculum as part of a drive to educate children about the countryside, according to campaigners.
The Countryside Alliance believes children should be taught about every aspect of rural life, from food production to pest control, as well as being offered outdoor pursuits such as clay pigeon shooting, horse-riding and fishing.
The lobby group is calling on the government to create a new subject area of outdoor education that children could be assessed on throughout school, including at GCSE level. Alternatively, schools could incorporate outdoor activities into other subjects, for example farm visits in geography, beekeeping in biology or even falconry to learn about weights in a maths class.
It is part of a rural manifesto calling for affordable housing and improved services in rural areas, a repeal of the Hunting Act, more support for farmers and improved outdoor education in schools.
Rob Gray, Campaigns Director of the Countryside Alliance, said children should be taught about traditional country sports like clay pigeon shooting and fishing and given the opportunity to take part. He also said they should be educated about hunting with dogs, even though it has been made illegal, by visiting kennels and finding out about the sport within the law.
"Whatever your view of it, hunting, shooting and fishing and country pursuits are part of the living working countryside in which hundreds of thousands of people take part and are employed," he said. "We should not cherry pick just the cuddly bunny bits [of rural life], teachers and children should be able to get an insight into the what goes on in the countryside – from country pursuits to food production – and then make up their own minds."
However Christine Blower, General Secretary National Union of Teachers, said efforts to get more children enjoying the outdoors should be led by the teaching establishment rather than a pressure group.
"The decision should be taken at school level with heads and teachers deciding the appropriateness of it," she said.
Louise Robertson of the League Against Cruel Sports, said children should not be taught about blood sports.
"We would not support encouraging young children to go out and shoot animals for fun," she said. "I would much rather the school curriculum focuses on areas like maths and English."
DISCLAIMER: Please ensure that you keep all correspondence polite and any demonstrations peaceful. We do not condone threatening, intimidating or illegal activity. Please ensure that you are acting within the law at all times.
Though we try to keep all information contained within this site up to date and correct, we cannot gurantee this.
